Published July 27th, 2009 by Future Atlas

“Armageddon in Islamabad”

Pakistani flag by openDemocracyA Sunni extremist takeover of Pakistan would be an immense threat to the US and hard to counter, Bruce Reidel writes in The National Interest.

Such a takeover

would create the greatest threat the United States has yet to face in its war on terror. Pakistan as an Islamic-extremist safe haven would bolster al-Qaeda’s capabilities tenfold. The jihadist threat bred in Afghanistan would be a cakewalk in comparison. The old Afghan sanctuary was remote, landlocked and weak; a new one in Pakistan would be in the Islamic mainstream with a modern communications and transportation infrastructure linking it to the world.

“A jihadist victory is neither imminent nor inevitable, but it is now a real possibility in the foreseeable future,” he writes. It would require the Taliban expanding eastward, and teaming up with the radical group Lashkar-e-Taiba in the Punjab, assisted by harnessing the grievances of Pakistan’s vast impoverished classes.

A jihadist Suni emirate would face significant internal resistance, Reidel writes, including from Shia, who make up a fifth of the population. To counter potential opposition within the army, the new regime would likely create a parallel military force, like the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

“In the end, we would be left with an extremist-controlled Pakistan, infested with violence, an almost completely dysfunctional economy, harsh laws and even-harsher methods for imposing them, and above all a nuclear-armed nation controlled by terrorist sympathizers,” Reidel suggests.

External effects would be severe:

  • Pakistan would increase its influence in Afghanistan, with some of the Pashtun areas all but incorporated into Pakistan.
  • Afghanistan would be split between Pakistan-backed Pashtun and their Tajik, Uzbek, and Shia opponents backed by Russia, Iran, and the Central Asian countries.
  • Iran and Pakistan would face off in Afghanistan, and support separatists movements. Iran would accelerate its nuclear program in the face of the Pakistani threat.
  • India and Pakistan might easily come to blows, with anti-Indian extremists in power in Islamabad.
  • Israel and Pakistan would be active adversaries, but Israel would have few options for countering the distant Asian state.
  • All Muslim countries would face the prospect of a newly energized radical movement using Pakistan as a support and training base.
  • The United States would lack military options, and a blockade would be difficult to carry out and hard to sustain.

(Image courtesy openDemocracy)


1 Response to ““Armageddon in Islamabad””

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1

    Future Atlas» Blog Archive » Pakistan: Extremists against Extremism?

    Pingback on Aug 20th, 2009 at 10:34 pm

Leave a Reply

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>